55 Chapel Street, Suite 202, Newton, Ma 02458

75 Gilcreast Road, Suite 305, Londonderry, NH 03053

Thank you for visiting. NESCA Notes has moved!

For articles after June 4, 2018 please visit nesca-newton.com/nesca-notes/.

Search This Blog

Monday, April 6, 2015

To Succeed at School, Children with ADHD Need BOTH Medication and Non-Medication Treatments

From The Creativity Post

By Alvaro Fernandez
March 24, 2015

Synopsis: Aca­d­e­mic prob­lems are extremely com­mon in chil­dren with ADHD. An impor­tant ques­tion then is whether long-term aca­d­e­mic func­tion­ing can improve with appro­pri­ate treat­ment. This new study provides important clues. 

Aca­d­e­mic prob­lems are extremely com­mon in chil­dren with ADHD, and often the issue that leads to refer­ral for an ADHD evaluation.

Aca­d­e­mic out­comes can be mea­sured in 2 dif­fer­ent ways — aca­d­e­mic achieve­ment and aca­d­e­mic per­for­mance — and both are com­pro­mised in chil­dren with ADHD. Aca­d­e­mic achieve­ment refers to the infor­ma­tion and skills that chil­dren acquire and is typ­i­cally mea­sured by stan­dard­ized tests. Aca­d­e­mic per­for­mance focuses on direct mea­sures of suc­cess at school such as grades, grade reten­tion, high school grad­u­a­tion, and col­lege enrollment.

An impor­tant ques­tion then, for mil­lions of kids diag­nosed with ADHD and for their par­ents and edu­ca­tors, is whether long-term aca­d­e­mic func­tion­ing can improve with appro­pri­ate treat­ment.

New Study

A new study pub­lished online in the Jour­nal of Atten­tion Dis­or­ders [Long-Term Out­comes of ADHD: Aca­d­e­mic Achieve­ment and Per­for­mance] rep­re­sents a valu­able effort to answer that question.

The authors began by con­duct­ing a sys­tem­atic lit­er­a­ture search to iden­tify all poten­tially rel­e­vant stud­ies. Specif­i­cally, they looked for all stud­ies pub­lished in peer reviewed jour­nals between 1980 and 2012 that exam­ined aca­d­e­mic out­comes asso­ci­ated with treat­ment over at least a 2-year period.

Some of these stud­ies com­pared aca­d­e­mic out­comes in treated and non-treated chil­dren; oth­ers had no com­par­i­son group but looked at achieve­ment and/or per­for­mance mea­sures before and after treat­ment, while oth­ers com­pared out­comes between treated youth and youth with­out ADHD.

As a result of this search, the authors iden­ti­fied 14 stud­ies that looked at aca­d­e­mic achieve­ment out­comes and 12 that assessed per­for­mance out­comes were com­pared. To cre­ate a com­mon out­come met­ric across mul­ti­ple stud­ies that used vary­ing meth­ods, stud­ies were grouped into those that showed treat­ment ben­e­fits and those that did not. They then sim­ply counted the num­ber of stud­ies where evi­dence of treat­ment ben­e­fits was found.

For stud­ies that com­pared treated vs. untreated youth, or aca­d­e­mic func­tion­ing before and after treat­ment, ben­e­fit was defined as a sta­tis­ti­cally sig­nif­i­cant gain asso­ci­ated with treat­ment. Where treated youth were com­pared to youth with­out ADHD, ben­e­fit was assumed when aca­d­e­mic out­comes for youth with ADHD were not sig­nif­i­cantly worse than for non-ADHD controls.

The Results

For achieve­ment test scores, treat­ment yielded improve­ment in 7 of 9 stud­ies (78%) when the com­par­i­son was with pre-treatment base­line and in 4 of 5 stud­ies (80%) when treated and untreated youth were compared.

For aca­d­e­mic per­for­mance out­comes, improve­ment was found in 1 of 2 stud­ies that used pre– vs. post-treatment com­par­isons and in 4 of 10 stud­ies com­par­ing treated and non-treated youth.

Over­all, there­fore, there was greater evi­dence of treat­ment ben­e­fits on achieve­ment out­comes than on per­for­mance outcomes.

The authors also exam­ined how treat­ment out­comes var­ied for med­ica­tion, non-medication, and treat­ments that com­bined both approaches. Although the num­ber of stud­ies on which these com­par­isons were based is small, avail­able evi­dence sup­ported the value of mul­ti­modal treat­ment (e.g., the com­bi­na­tion of med­ica­tion, behav­ior ther­apy, school con­sul­ta­tion).

Such treat­ment yielded ben­e­fits in 100% of stud­ies exam­in­ing achieve­ment out­comes and 67% of those exam­in­ing per­for­mance out­comes. For med­ica­tion treat­ment only the per­cent­ages were 75% and 33% respec­tively; for non-medical treat­ments, the fig­ures were 75% and 50%.

Sum­mary and Implications

The over­all mes­sage from this sum­mary of research exam­in­ing how treat­ment affects long-term aca­d­e­mic out­comes in youth with ADHD is pos­i­tive. Many stud­ies found improve­ment with ADHD treat­ment for both achieve­ment and per­for­mance out­comes, with evi­dence sug­gest­ing that treat­ment has more con­sis­tently pos­i­tive impacts on achieve­ment than on per­for­mance.

As the study notes, “More achieve­ment test and aca­d­e­mic per­for­mance out­comes improved with mul­ti­modal (100% and 67%, respec­tively) than phar­ma­co­log­i­cal (75% and 33%) or non-pharmacological (75% and 50%) treat­ment alone.”

This is con­sis­tent with the gen­er­ally held view that most youth for ADHD should receive multi-modal treat­ment as opposed to med­ica­tion or non-medication approaches alone.

How­ever, as recently found in another study that exam­ined treat­ment prac­tices in a large num­ber of pedi­a­tri­cians (Study Finds Large Gaps between Research and Prac­tice in ADHD Diag­no­sis and Treat­ment) while med­ica­tion treat­ment was rec­om­mended for over 90% of youth diag­nosed with ADHD, behav­ioral treat­ment was rec­om­mended fewer than 15% of the time.

Thus, many chil­dren may not be receiv­ing mul­ti­modal treat­ment in com­mu­nity care.

It is impor­tant to place these find­ings in the con­text of the lim­ited data base on which they were drawn. First, despite sys­tem­at­i­cally search­ing the rel­e­vant research over a 32-year period, the authors iden­ti­fied only 5 stud­ies that specif­i­cally com­pared long-term aca­d­e­mic out­comes in treated vs. non-treated youth.

And, these stud­ies were not nec­es­sar­ily randomized-controlled tri­als, which makes it impos­si­ble to con­clude that pos­i­tive out­comes asso­ci­ated with treat­ment can be attrib­uted specif­i­cally to treat­ment itself.

In the years ahead, we hope that the research needed to bet­ter address these impor­tant issues will become more avail­able. We need bet­ter data to inform deci­sions as to how to best help each child suc­ceed at school, and at home.

In the mean­time, as we will out­line in our upcom­ing online course, we need to ensure chil­dren with atten­tion deficits access appro­pri­ate non-medication treat­ments, com­ple­ment­ing the more com­mon phar­ma­co­log­i­cal ones.

About the Authors

Dr. David Rabiner is a child clin­i­cal psy­chol­o­gist, direc­tor of under­grad­u­ate stud­ies in the Depart­ment of Psy­chol­ogy and Neu­ro­science at Duke Uni­ver­sity, and founder of the Atten­tion Research Update.

Alvaro Fer­nan­dez, named a Young Global Leader by the World Eco­nomic Forum, is the co-author of The Sharp­Brains Guide to Brain Fit­ness: How to Opti­mize Brain Health and Per­for­mance at Any Age. They have part­nered to offer the upcom­ing online course How to Nav­i­gate Con­ven­tional and Com­ple­men­tary ADHD Treat­ments for Healthy Brain Devel­op­ment. (May, 2015; reg­is­tra­tion open)

No comments:

Post a Comment